The Key to Theosophy

Helena
Petrovna Blavatsky
1831
-1891
_______________________
The Key to Theosophy
By
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky
On The Septenary Constitution
of Our Planet
Q. I understand that you describe our earth as forming part of a
chain of
earths?
A. We do. But the other six "earths" or globes, are not
on the same plane of
objectivity as our earth is; therefore we cannot see them.
Q. Is that on account of the great distance?
A. Not at all, for we see with our naked eye planets and even stars
at
immeasurably greater distances; but it is owing to those six globes
being
outside our physical means of perception, or plane of being. It is
not only that
their material density, weight, or fabric are entirely different
from those of
our earth and the other known planets; but they are (to us) on an
entirely
different layer of space, so to speak; a layer not to be perceived
or felt by
our physical senses. And when I say "layer," please do
not allow your fancy to
suggest to you layers like strata or beds laid one over the other,
for this
would only lead to another absurd misconception. What I mean by
"layer" is that plane of infinite space which by its nature cannot
fall under our ordinary
waking perceptions, whether mental or physical; but which exists in
nature
outside of our normal mentality or consciousness, outside of our
three-dimensional space, and outside of our division of time. Each
of the seven
fundamental planes (or layers) in space-of course as a whole, as
the pure space
of Locke's definition, not as our finite space-has its own
objectivity and
subjectivity, its own space and time, its own consciousness and set
of senses.
But all this will be hardly comprehensible to one trained in the
modern ways of
thought.
Q. What do you mean by a different set of senses? Is there anything
on our human plane that you could bring as an illustration of what you say,
just to give a
clearer idea of what you may mean by this variety of senses,
spaces, and
respective perceptions?
A. None; except, perhaps, that which for Science would be rather a
handy peg on which to hang a counter argument. We have a different set of
senses in
dreamlife, have we not? We feel, talk, hear, see, taste and
function in general
on a different plane; the change of state of our consciousness
being evidenced
by the fact that a series of acts and events embracing years, as we
think, pass
ideally through our mind in one instant. Well, that extreme
rapidity of our
mental operations in dreams, and the perfect naturalness, for the
time being, of
all the other functions, show us that we are on quite another
plane. Our
philosophy teaches us that, as there are seven fundamental forces
in nature, and
seven planes of being, so there are seven states of consciousness
in which man
can live, think, remember and have his being. To enumerate these
here is
impossible, and for this one has to turn to the study of Eastern
metaphysics.
But in these two states-the waking and the dreaming-every ordinary
mortal, from
a learned philosopher down to a poor untutored savage, has a good
proof that
such states differ.
Q. You do not accept, then, the well-known explanations of biology
and
physiology to account for the dream state?
A. We do not. We reject even the hypotheses of your psychologists,
preferring
the teachings of Eastern Wisdom. Believing in seven planes of
Kosmic being and states of Consciousness, with regard to the Universe or the
Macrocosm, we stop at the fourth plane, finding it impossible to go with any
degree of certainty
beyond. But with respect to the Microcosm, or man, we speculate
freely on his
seven states and principles.
Q. How do you explain these?
A. We find, first of all, two distinct beings in man; the spiritual
and the
physical, the man who thinks, and the man who records as much of
these thoughts as he is able to assimilate. Therefore we divide him into two
distinct natures; the upper or the spiritual being, composed of three
principles or aspects; and the lower or the physical quaternary, composed of
four-in all seven.
__________________________

Find answers to more questions
with these Theosophy links
Independent Theosophical Blog
One liners and quick explanations
About aspects of Theosophy
H P Blavatsky is usually
the only
Theosophist that most
people have ever
heard of. Let’s put that
right
An
Independent Theosophical Republic
Links to Free Online Theosophy
Study Resources; Courses, Writings,
Try these if you are looking
for a local group
UK Listing of Theosophical Groups